ODIHR logo.

OSCE/ODIHR Electoral Recommendations Database

Home About Search Help Staff Login

Search Recommendations

Change search criteria
Clear all filters
Belarus
from
to
Any
from
to
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any

Search results

See all Print
Export
Search criteria:
Page 3 Sort by: Secondary thematic area Location: Belarus
Sort by
Location Year of election Election type Recommendation # in final report Type of recommendation Thematic area Secondary thematic area Type of change required Status of implementation Comment
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
All relevant laws and decrees should be reviewed and amended to ensure that any restrictions on fundamental freedoms have the character of exception, are imposed only when necessary in a democratic society, are proportionate with a legitimate aim, and are not applied in an arbitrary and overly restrictive manner.
Recommendation # in final report: 2
Type of recommendation: Priority
Thematic area: Legal Framework
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Electoral System and Legal Framework
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
To ensure legal certainty, fundamental aspects of the electoral process should be regulated by law and not by CEC resolutions. Legal reform should be undertaken early enough in advance of elections through a transparent and inclusive legislative process with all relevant stakeholders.
Recommendation # in final report: 4
Type of recommendation: Priority
Thematic area: Legal Framework
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Electoral System and Legal Framework
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
To enhance transparency and accountability, results should be published disaggregated by polling station and separately for each candidate and include votes cast against all candidates and the number of valid, invalid and spoiled ballots.
Recommendation # in final report: 6
Type of recommendation: Priority
Thematic area: Election Day
Type of change required: Practice
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Election Day
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
The vote count should be held in a transparent manner, whereby all PEC members, observers and candidate proxies would be able to verify the outcome of the process. As a means to build public confidence, consideration should be given to announcing and showing the selection on each ballot to those present as well as announcing all the figures entered into PEC protocols.
Recommendation # in final report: 9
Type of recommendation: Priority
Thematic area: Election Day
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Early Voting and Election Day
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
To enhance the transparency of tabulation and instil public confidence in the accuracy of the results, DECs should conduct uninterrupted tabulation from the handover of PEC protocols until the completion of DEC result protocols in the presence of PEC members and observers.
Recommendation # in final report: 10
Type of recommendation: Priority
Thematic area: Election Day
Type of change required: Practice
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Early Voting and Election Day
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
Consideration should be given to developing a centralized, computerized, and publicly available voter register in line with data protection regulations. A legal deadline for voter registration prior to election day could be introduced, with additional entries permitted only in accordance with clearly defined legal requirements subject to judicial control.
Recommendation # in final report: 13
Type of recommendation: Other
Thematic area: Voter Registration
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Voter Registration
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
The mechanism of CEC formation should be reconsidered to provide sufficient safeguards for its independence and impartiality and to enhance public confidence in the election administration.
Recommendation # in final report: 14
Type of recommendation: Other
Thematic area: Election Administration
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Election Administration
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
In view of ensuring the impartiality of the election administration and increasing public trust, local executive officials should not be allowed to simultaneously serve on election commissions or interfere in their activities.
Recommendation # in final report: 15
Type of recommendation: Other
Thematic area: Election Administration
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Election Administration
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
To enhance the pluralistic representation on election commissions and to promote confidence in the election administration, consideration should be given to ensuring the inclusion of commission members nominated by all contestants. To enhance the independence of election commission members, commissions should not replicate existing hierarchical relationships in public institutions.
Recommendation # in final report: 16
Type of recommendation: Other
Thematic area: Election Administration
Type of change required: Practice
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Election Administration
…
Belarus 2016 EOM Parliamentary elections
To ensure suffrage rights, restrictions on the right to stand of individuals with an unexpunged criminal record should be reviewed. Such restrictions should apply for only the most serious of offences.
Recommendation # in final report: 17
Type of recommendation: Other
Thematic area: Candidate Registration
Type of change required: Legal
Status of implementation: Not implemented
Year of assessment: 2019
Final report heading: Candidate Registration
…
1 2 3 4 5 … 10
of 10
Searching for results

Contact

Email: office@odihr.pl
Tel: +48 22 520 06 00

OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights

Miodowa 10
00-251 Warsaw, Poland